Look, Granny and I’ve enough problems without beatings, too! Seriously, both you and Mr. Garland have some valid factors. I appreciate the (relatively) civil but forthright shade. But we should stick to subject. And this issue in this article is Granny and me. You see, Anony, it’s not just about me.
Granny is a figurative Granny, to be certain. In reality some grannys are wealthy, many more aren’t. Granny is frightened. Granny has lots of complicated health issues probably, not one which follows a “guideline just.” Granny needs competent health care. So granny requires a real doctor. Sure, nurse professionals are okay for the gain access to, the tiny stuff, however the complicated stuff? 5 and a chicken for the treatment they offer a Medicaid patient in our condition.
5 for our services looks better than nothing at all. And you want to put more and more people with this system? The endemic issue of political self-serving crosses political lines and leaves doctors AND patients like Granny yearning for the “days of the past” when individuals who stood between them were not needed.
- 5000 at 5 percent substance interest 3 years
- Bank or investment company of Nova Scotia (BNS) – $14.40
- Property Address: 1234 Main Street
- Funding a plan
- A property condition survey (PCR),
- Whether the statement refers to voting or an election,
- IT: Projects Delivered/On-Time
- Deductions for taxes already paid, including sales taxes, foreign taxes and self-employment taxes
It would definitely beat what is going on now. Politicians, no matter how well-intentioned, shouldn’t be in the carrying on business of medication. So what is likely to happen? What I see changing (at least in the short term) is two-tiered medication. At this time, this seems inevitable given the looming doctor lack.
Oh sure, to quell discontent among the rank and file Americans because of the doctor shortage, politicians shall probably open gates for international medical doctors regardless of the foot-stomping by the AMA. I certainly trust you: health care is a mess. No one understands what it costs because no one wants Granny and me to learn.
But I remain optimistic that a solution that eventually gets rid of much of the costly administrative, legal, and third-party over head for healthcare that returns to a pact between doctor and patient ALONE are available. Perhaps it’ll involve information patient and technology engagement in their treatment. Maybe new financial incentives for savings and investment for Granny’s own care that began at her birth.
Maybe a transparent and understandable insurance market will establish. Something else Maybe. Who knows? Nonetheless it will NOT be the existing envisioned system – no matter how it’s being colored. That system is on the fiscal bridge to hell. One thing’s for several. This health care tale has ended. Not by an extended shot.
Or it constrains growth. Now obviously, everything else equal, if banks stop lending, that constrains financial activity. That is, if those with money to free cannot make investments their money via one particular fraudulent institutions we call “banks”, then less investment or financing takes place. However the above assumption that all else must be equal is of course total nonsense.
That is, the deflationary effect of preventing banks from trading or lending can simply be compensated for by increasing the amount of money supply. Those Austrians, yawn, yawn. Another factor that plays a part in the reluctance to constrain, if not ban bank or investment company lending is the favorite perception that money in a bank in some way represents real wealth; and that failure to invest this money means real wealth lying idle. Most politicians suffer from this delusion, and those seated on Britain’s recent investigation into bank even, the Vickers commission, experienced from the delusion.
The truth is that money in banks is only some reserve keeping entries (or if you like, numbers in computer systems). Money is nothing more than a claim to resources. It is not “resources” as a result. It generally does not equivalent real investment in the same sense as a residence or manufacturer is a genuine investment. Where we started Back?